Research Archives - Page 2 of 6 - Cromwell Property Group
A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
March 14, 2023

Australian Market Outlook for 2023

According to industry experts, commercial property investors will be cautious until interest rates peak later in 2023, while inflation and cost of living pressure will weigh heavily on the economic outlook.

Global independent real estate consultancy Knight Frank predicts that, despite the challenges present in the global economy, the Australian capital markets will outperform others amidst looming downturn and will remain a global safe haven for global investors.

Businesses continue to show a desire to be headquartered in our nation’s cities, with overall demand for CBD office space remaining positive, according to the latest data from the Property Council of Australia (PCA).

Research by the property industry’s leading advocate showed that, on average, demand for office space increased by 0.1% across Australia’s CBDs between July 2022 and January 2023. The future supply of office space in CBD markets is forecast to be higher than the historical average through 2023, before retreating under the average in 2024 and 2025. Supply in non-CBD markets is set to be higher than the historical average in the first half of this year before declining in the following years.

The state of the office market

As businesses countrywide adopt hybrid work models – and employees are encouraged back into the office – the market continues to adapt to the diverse needs of tenants and occupiers. Vacancy rates are shifting slightly across CBDs, Knight Frank predicts that short-term market disruption is more likely to be in the form and function of office space – there is a growing expectation that building owners create office space experiences to entice work-at-home staff back into CBDs.

In the six months to January 2023, tenant demand outstripped supply in Brisbane, pushing the vacancy rate down from 13.9% to 12.9%. The PCA found that there is less than 100,000sqm of office space coming online in Brisbane over the next three years, 72% of which has already been pre-committed.

Similarly, vacancy declined marginally in Perth from 15.8% to 15.6%; and Hobart recorded a drop from 2.7% to 2.5% – now its lowest rate since 2008.

In other capitals, vacancy rates rose slightly – from 8.6% to 8.9% in Canberra; 10.1% to 11.3% in Sydney; and 12.9% to 13.8% Melbourne. Adelaide’s vacancy increased from 14.2% to 16.1%, driven by above average supply additions – as a result, the South Australian capital now has the highest vacancy rate in the country. In those markets where vacancy increased, there were moves toward prime stock over secondary stock. Non-CBD areas saw a decline from 15.2 to 15.1 per cent, with tenant demand lifting 0.3%.

 

Australian office space trends

There is a consensus among Australian property experts that the following represent the most prevalent emerging trends in the local market. These include:

  • Workplace change is set to continue – hybrid working environments are now the overwhelming majority in most of Australia’s capital cities. As such, businesses are set to continue to evaluate, and adapt to, employees’ changing working preferences. Workspaces will continue to be reworked and refined over the foreseeable future to accommodate occupiers changing needs.
  • The need to create a workplace experience – Knight Frank has found that there is an increasing expectation by building occupants that owners provide experiences and opportunities, including upgraded end-of-trip facilities, wellness centres, food and beverage options and more.
  • Tenants’ ESG interest – ESG concerns are increasingly becoming front-of-mind for building occupiers and tenants, as well as the general population. As such, building owners will need to invest in environment and sustainability in their key decision-making processes going forward.

 

Examining office rents

According to the latest Cushman & Wakefield Marketbeat report, premium grade gross face rents rose 6.0% in Brisbane over the final 2022 quarter – to average $965 per square metre – one of the largest rises in recent years. A-grade also recorded an increase in gross face rents, though slightly more modest – at 1% QoQ (6% YoY) – and B-grade rents remained stable over the final quarter of 2023.

In the Sydney CBD, prime face rents held at an average of $1,410 sqm per year, increasing 4.2% over the course of 2022. Premium, A-grade and B-grade gross face rents averaged $1,525, $1,335 and $1,045 per square metre, respectively.

Market-outlook-2023-office-occupancy

The Melbourne Marketbeat report revealed that rents and incentive levels remain stable, as quality office accommodation options remain available in the Victorian capital’s CBD. Premium and A-grade net face rents in Melbourne were steady, reflecting the city’s “new and better quality stock” – rates averaged $725 and $660 sqm per year, respectively.

 

Industrial property

Knight Frank has found that, as global supply chain issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine begin to ease, and with the container freight cost indexes backdown to late 2020 levels, the industrial market in Australia is facing an acute shortage of space for near term or imminent occupation. This space shortage is forcing adaptation from both occupiers and developers, as they seek to navigate unprecedented market conditions.

Much of the current ‘available’ space is still under construction with very limited existing stock available. Consequently, lease deals are increasingly being negotiated 6-18 months in advance for existing space – an extended timeframe that previously was reserved for new construction.

Industrial rents are growing rapidly and, with competition high, landlords are frequently able to select from a number of competing offers for the same tenancy. Large international and ASX listed tenants are generally favoured in this process, which has left smaller businesses at real risk of being without business premises.

 

Retail space

According to Colliers, rents and incentives remained stable throughout most asset classes through the final quarter of 2022, the exception being neighbourhood centres – where rents grew +0.4% nationally in response to low vacancies and tenant demand within the strong-performing asset subclass.

By the end of 2022, occupancy levels for retail assets were at 98.53%, up slightly from 98.44% at the same time 12 months prior.

Rental yields have remained stable, when compared to other sectors, as a result of more headroom on a yield spread basis – when compared to the 10-year bond yield and borrowing costs. The national weighted average retail yield was 5.50%, as at the end of 2022.

Summary

In summary, the consensus among industry experts seems to be that 2023 will be a year that Australian markets will begin to shake off the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine. 2022 saw some recovery in selected metrics, and the next 12 months will be largely determined by expected interest rate peaks, as well as ongoing inflation concerns. Though a large amount of uncertainty still remains for investors, Australian markets as a whole are expected to outperform others across the world.

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
February 15, 2023

Polish appeal: Europe’s most dynamic country should be a focus for savvy investors

Poland’s performance prospects are compelling. In our view it is being unfairly discounted by investors due to its proximity to Ukraine. We also believe that it is set for sustained occupier demand growth due to the strength of long-term fundamentals related to economic growth and demographics. A combination of rising occupier demand increasing rental potential, a lack of space suitable for modern businesses and a flawed perception of risk creates a powerful impetus for savvy investors to seize the chance today to acquire good quality real estate and benefit from superior performance tomorrow.

In the first article of this series, we explore why Polish investment prospects are so compelling. In future articles we will examine the performance opportunities presented by individual real estate sectors.

Risk perception: Extreme caution towards Poland is misplaced

International investors have shunned Poland since the Ukraine invasion given its proximity to the conflict and its high associated risk perception. Polish real estate investment volumes in H2 2022 were 35% down on the five-year average according to RCA (figure 1). Polish prime yields have moved out between 50-90 bps over the last year and it remains one of the highest-yielding European markets (figure 2).

Polish-real-estate-investment

Prime-yields-in-Poland

Logical reasoning implies that this heightened risk perception is misplaced. Indeed, far from being an inhibitor of future performance, proximity to Ukraine is likely to be an accelerator of it.

Our baseline assumption is there will not be a horizontal escalation of the Ukraine conflict in which Poland is invaded. Given Russia’s battlefield setbacks, their inability to retain territorial gains and the assertive, unified position of NATO and the EU towards Russian aggression, we believe such escalation is highly unlikely. If such an escalation did eventuate, we would all have far more to worry about than real estate values in any case. In the medium-term (the next five years), we also assume that the conflict reaches a settled state and active combat ends. Accepting that, let’s turn to the real estate fundamentals.

 

Economics and demographics: Dynamism in leading occupier demand indicators

According to Oxford Economics, Poland will benefit from some of the strongest economic growth in Europe over the next five years (figure 3). Because such growth is a leading indicator of occupier demand, this bodes well for real estate performance. However, we believe that even these bullish growth assumptions may be too pessimistic as they fail to account for the full impact of Poland’s post-war relationship with Ukraine.

Economic-projections

Poland has been a hub for shipping arms and aid to Ukraine over the last year. Post-war, it will be the conduit through which the reconstruction effort is funnelled. Given the damage Russia has inflicted – the reconstruction costs are estimated by the World Bank amount to €322 billion so far – that effort will be significant. There is talk of a new Marshall Plan, the American programme that turbo-charged Europe’s economic recovery after the second world war. Poland’s leading role in the reconstruction effort will be solidified by the international creditability it has gained by virtue of its resolute response to the invasion. This will translate into far greater foreign direct investment (FDI) from international capital once the risk perception declines.

Poland has been a haven for Ukrainian refugees, with 7.5 million fleeing across the border according to the European Investment Bank. Some 1.5 million are estimated to remain there today, many of whom are likely to settle permanently. The presence of so many additional people has caused some immediate tensions by exacerbating pressure on housing and social infrastructure. Short-term challenges aside, these immigrants will inject dynamism into Poland’s demographic profile by adding labour and population. The new arrivals tend to be younger and better educated than the average Pole. It will be an attractive destination for corporate occupiers seeking to tap that plentiful, affordable supply of skilled labour.

Current forecasts do not, in our view, fully account for the additional economic and demographic growth impetus associated with these factors which will directly translate into stronger real estate demand.

 

Conclusion: Unwarranted risk and solid fundamentals make Polish real estate an investment gem

In summary, we believe that the Ukraine-related risk of Polish real estate investment is over-estimated. We also consider that economic and demographic growth drivers will stimulate sustained occupier demand in the medium-term and long-term. Investors who access the market now can secure assets and development sites aligned to future demand and associated rental growth at higher yields than will be available once the Russian-Ukraine conflict settles. Exposure to capital and income growth potential will, if executed correctly, deliver out-performance. That is why we are so optimistic on Polish real estate.

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
December 7, 2022

The Proptech Revolution: how technology is reshaping Real Estate

Tom Duncan, Head of Research, Strategy & Product, Cromwell Property Group


In just two decades, advances in computer technology have radically altered our economies, and our societies, faster than at any other point in history. The opportunities resulting from developments like Wi-Fi, smartphones, artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, and connected devices – or the ‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) – are so significant that they represent a new industrial revolution. ‘Industry 4.0’ is of a magnitude that is as transformational – if not more so – as the harnessing of steam power or the invention of the mass assembly line (Figure 1).

Industrial-4.0-age

Traditionally, real estate has been a laggard in embracing this new technological era – consumers and businesses have instead been leading the way. Recently though, there has been a realisation among landlords, occupiers, and building users about the power of property technology – or ‘proptech’ – to provide better, more engaging and sustainable assets.

As a result, proptech is radically redefining the requirements for successful buildings. Landlords must include this technology if they are to attract, and retain, occupiers – and to protect, create, and grow income.

The proptech universe is varied and diverse, touching every aspect of real estate – from identifying investment strategies, to construction and design through to operations. In this article, we consider three important dimensions of proptech at asset-level: smart technology, occupier engagement, and operational efficiencies.

Smart technology

‘Smart’ technology refers to any network in which software and hardware are connected to provide immediate information. When applied to buildings, smart technology allows 24/7 visibility over operations, which enable efficiencies to be optimised in real-time. Heating, lighting, and air conditioning systems can be automated, for example, meaning that they are adjusted up or down in accordance with how heavily parts of the building are being used.

As such, smart buildings make the building more attuned to user needs. Perhaps more crucially though, they minimise needless consumption of precious water and energy resources. Smart buildings are an essential prerequisite to creating more sustainable, environmentally friendly real estate. After all, you cannot reduce what you cannot measure.

An example of this is Cromwell’s partnership with Deepki – a consumption data tool for analysing energy, water, waste, and carbon dioxide use – within our European portfolio. The Deepki platform comprises an ESG data hub that provides a comprehensive view of the current efficiency of every asset. It means we can identify where improvements can be made to align to Paris agreement climate change objectives or when assets may become stranded, thereby allowing proactive management or divestment.

Closer to home, smart technology is a key component in our ongoing refurbishment of 400 George Street, Brisbane – a 44,000sqm building that comprises of office, retail, and childcare uses. We have delivered best-in-class end-of-trip facilities using smart technology and fixtures that measure water consumption in real time. We have also upgraded the building access control system to Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Security Expert.

Our focus is now transitioning to refinement and upgrading of the building management system (BMS) to the EcoStruxure platform, which will allow continuous monitoring of equipment and operations. The upgrade will allow us to improve performance and undertake pre-emptive maintenance before issues emerge as well as easing reporting. This type of smart technology typically results in 80% of issues being resolved remotely, a 29% fall in unscheduled maintenance and 20% lower energy costs.

Smart-technology-improves-operation

Occupier engagement

Proptech allows human users to understand and interact with the building in new ways, usually via smartphones. So-called occupier engagement apps can offer automated building/guest access, direct temperature/lighting control, food/coffee pre-ordering or pre-booking of desks or meeting rooms. These features can connect individual users to the wider community within the asset through message-boards or meet-ups, or to the local community by offering discounts at local businesses or advertising nearby events. It makes it easier for any building faults to be reported directly to the asset manager meaning faster resolution – trip hazards can be photographed and logged immediately on the app for example.

Occupiers can derive information on energy or water use at a touch of a button or gain deeper insight on how their staff use the space. For landlords, occupier engagement apps can provide valuable data on how occupiers use their buildings, including where pressure points are and where improvements can be made. Apps like these create a more collaborative relationship between landlords and occupiers which assists to meet compliance obligations, achieve ESG objectives, and build long-term value.

Occupier engagement is a priority for our 400 George Street refurbishment. By adding an app connected to a smart framework, developed by Schneider Electric EcoStruxure, we expect to increase the appeal of the asset to occupiers. In addition to aiding occupier retention, apps can increase brand awareness, increase occupier satisfaction, provide data for better asset management, and ultimately deliver a higher investment return.

Ocuppier-engagement

Operational efficiencies

Proptech offers significant potential to remove some of the hurdles that have traditionally impeded the efficient occupation and management of real estate. Virtual lease or contractor contracts, for example, can be used to lessen the time it takes to formalise occupier agreements, engage services, and lower associated legal costs. Virtual data-rooms can be established to centralise access to building information preserving data that may otherwise be lost, and accelerate the due diligence process when assets are traded. AI can be used to automate data collection and analysis.

While the technology is at a fledging stage, Cromwell has already experimented with using AI technology to enter historic leases into Yardi, our asset management software, and explored virtual data room technology. Though being an early adopter in this space may be disadvantageous if dominant providers emerge, it is still critical to monitor developments and be ready to adopt suitable solutions at an appropriate time.

The real estate industry is just beginning to harness the power of proptech to make buildings and their management better. It is a journey without an end, given that technology will continue to evolve and iterate at an accelerating rate as one advancement builds on another. It is crucial for landlords to understand the transformational impact of proptech, and to adapt accordingly. Investors, occupiers, and building users are coming to expect proptech solutions within real estate. Those assets with the best technology will deliver superior performance; those without will under-perform. While it has been slow to get going, the proptech revolution promises to profound and utterly transform real estate.

It is crucial for landlords to understand the transformational impact of proptech, and to adapt accordingly. Investors, occupiers, and building users are coming to expect proptech solutions within real estate. Those assets with the best technology will deliver superior performance; those without will under-perform. While it has been slow to get going, the proptech revolution promises to profound and utterly transform real estate.

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
October 11, 2022

The impact of rising interest rates on real estate yields

Alex Dunn, Research Manager, Cromwell Property Group


Interest rates tell you how high the cost of borrowing is, or how high the rewards are for saving. So, if you are a borrower, the interest rate is the amount you are charged for borrowing money, shown as a percentage of the total amount of the loan. In 2022, interest rates have risen across Australia, Europe and the US.

The relationship between interest rates and real estate yields is important for investors to understand, given the potential impact of the former on the latter.

While we believe that recent interest rate increase will place upwards pressure on real estate yields, our research implies that other real estate fundamentals are also important, and theses will limit the extent of yield softening.

Statistically, our analysis shows there is a very close relationship between 10-year government bonds and real estate yields.

Government Bonds: Closely correlated with real estate yields

Government bonds are viewed as proxy for the ‘risk-free rate’, which is the theoretical rate of return for an investment that has no risk of financial loss. An increase in interest rates encourages saving and deters borrowing and in so doing raises the required rate of return for real estate investment.

In figure 1, we compare Eurozone government bonds to prime Eurozone office yields. A score of 1 means two variables are perfectly correlated, meaning they move in unison. A correlation of 0 means there is no relationship between them. The correlation between Eurozone government bonds and prime office yields over this period is 0.89. This implies a strong relationship and the long downward trend in real estate yields since 2001 is heavily linked to the fall in interest rates.

Prime-office-yields

Change-in-prime-office-yields

Although there is a strong correlation between the two variables, the magnitude of moves in real estate yields and bond yields has differed significantly over the past two decades. Figure 2 shows that real estate yields fell by an average of 280bp across major European markets from peak to trough, while bond yields reduced by 495bp over the same period. This suggests that real estate yield movements, although in line with bond yields, are far less volatile and are subject to other forces.

Figure 3 shows the spread between prime UK office yields and 10-year government bonds, and we have used data from the UK office market due its stable history. The spread at the end of 2021 was around 476bps, compared to the long-term average of 306bps. While there is no mathematical rule to indicate the spread which can trigger repricing, we believe the bond yield must first rise to reduce the spread to levels comparable with the long-term average before exerting direct upwards pressure on real estate yields.

UK-prime-office-yields

Figure 2 also shows that since 1992, there are two periods where the spread between UK prime office yields and 10-year government bonds significantly reduced: between 1993-7, and 2005-8. In both periods the UK was experiencing inflation above the Bank of England (BoE) target of 2%. This suggests that investors are willing to accept a lower spread between real estate yields and government bonds in periods of high inflation due to the perception that real estate is an inflationary hedge.

The Spread: What other factors impact capital values?

The volatility in the real estate-bond yield spread suggests the complex influence of several factors playing a role in affecting real estate yields. These include capital markets, macroeconomic variables, and real estate fundamentals.

The spread is related to the expectations around rental and capital value growth, which in turn are related to the supply/demand dynamics of a particular market. If demand for real estate from investors and/or occupiers is high relative to supply, then there will be a downward yield pressure. Where supply is high, for example due to a wave of development completions or occupier bankruptcies, this would exert upward yield pressure.

Despite the disruption brought on by the pandemic, many markets in both the office and logistics sector are undersupplied with available space. Figure 4 shows how the vacancy rates across European office and logistics and industrial properties are significantly below the levels witnessed in the aftermath of the GFC.

European-office-and-logistics

A combination of rising construction costs and economic uncertainty has also impacted the development pipeline for both the office and logistics sector. The lack of new stock being brought to the market will exacerbate the current supply/demand dynamics and cause faster prime rental growth.

Debt financing availability has also risen over the last decade due to greater availability of non-bank lenders. This will help maintain yields more than has been done in the past when interest rates rise.

Companies are also in a much healthier position today than they were during the GFC. Figure 5 shows the average loan to value ratio across Europe which has declined from a high of 58% in 2009 to 35% at the end of Q2 2022. As such companies should be better able to protect the downside during a weaker economic environment and, crucially for real estate investors, continue to pay their rent.

Loan-to-value-ratio

The weight of capital targeting real estate across Europe has doubled over the last ten years due to both greater desire for real estate exposure amongst historic investors and new entrants to the market such as sovereign wealth funds.

The significant weight of capital was reflected in the investment volume during the first half of 2022 which totalled €143bn according to RCA. This was the largest transaction volume recorded in H1, and also makes Q2 2022 the second highest rolling 12-month period on record, reflecting investors strong desire to put their money into real estate.

Conclusion: Interest rates are important but not the only factor

The combination of positive rental growth expectations brought on by encouraging supply/demand dynamics, the versatility in the debt markets, and sheer amount of money allocated towards real estate suggests that the spread between 10-year government bonds and real estate yields will be lower in the future. This would therefore reduce the rate of yield softening brought on by rising interest rates. Although we have used data on the European real estate market to explore this topic, the same trends permeate all western markets, and the implications are likely to be the same.

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
July 12, 2022

The relationship between interest rates and real estate yields

The relationship between interest rates, real estate yields and performance is important for investors to understand.

Cromwell’s latest report published by Alex Dunn and Tom Duncan from the research and investment strategy team sheds some light on this topic. Their analysis indicates that interest rate movements do not necessarily cause directly comparable real estate yield changes. The volatility in the yield gap between real estate yields and ten-year government bonds suggests that the influence of other factors play a substantial role in price movement.

This has implications for the extent of yield compression that investors can expect during periods of falling interest rates, as well as decompression when interest rates rise.

The full report can be found by clicking here.

The-relationship-between-interest-rates-and-real-estate-yields

A person typing on a laptop

Learn

Home Research Page 2
May 22, 2022

Supply chain adaptation will boost European occupier demand

A retreat from global supply chains is underway as businesses seek to maintain greater local inventories and production capacity. As global logistics networks are strained, businesses cannot yet fully enact their re-organisational plans despite a strong desire to do so. This implies momentum has yet to build and will only accelerate. More local inventory and production means more physical space required. With logistics and industrial/light industrial floorspace supply already at record lows across Europe, intensifying occupier demand will create even stronger rental impetus.

 

From global to local: how supply chains are changing

One of the most immediate and lasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic has been supply chain disruption. Erratic swings in demand – toilet rolls and computer monitors one minute, bicycles the next – were exacerbated by logistics interruptions ranging from congested ports and the Suez Canal blockage, labour shortages across the transportation industry and bans on certain exports deemed to be of national importance.

The extent of the disruption reflects the international nature of supply chains which first emerged in the 1980s enabled by new technology and globalisation.

A ‘Just-In-Time’ (JIT) supply chain philosophy in which decisions on where to source, manufacture and store stock are made purely on a financial basis has become standard practice. Goods and components are shipped on demand just before they are needed to minimise storage costs and optimise working capital. Production facilities are located in emerging economies with lower labour and operational costs.

The downside of JIT networks is that they rely on stability and do not cope well with sudden, unexpected change. Rapid demand fluctuations, shipping backlogs or border issues erode their functionality and undermine the ability of businesses to fulfil orders. Reliably mitigating disruption means prioritising resilience over cost, with higher volumes of inventory being stored and production being undertaken locally where it can be better guaranteed. This is the ‘Just-In-Case’ (JIC) approach, the benefits of which have been viscerally demonstrated by the pandemic and, as a result, a mass pivot towards it is underway.

A global survey of senior supply-chain executives by McKinsey, a management consultancy, in Q2 2020 found that 93% planned to make physical changes to their supply chains to ingrain flexibility, agility and resilience in response to the pandemic1. Multiple initiatives were planned including diversification of raw material sourcing, increasing critical inventory and nearshoring production and suppliers.

A survey of global CEOs by KPMG, a professional services firm, in Q3 2021 established that ‘supply chain risk’ was jointly ranked as the top threat to business growth alongside cyber security and climate change risk2. It was ranked second in 2020 reflecting the growing awareness of, and concern with, supply chain risk. There was a marked 10 percentage point increase in CEOs rating this as the biggest threat. Supply chain adaptation is clearly at the forefront of corporate agendas.

Rising risk and uncertainty: why change is occurring

Multiple factors are combining to foster rapid supply chain adaptation. The pandemic brought urgency to the need for change, ensuring that all businesses understand how fragile supply chains are and the need to ingrain resilience. Supply chain pressure rose immediately, reaching record levels in the Eurozone and the UK in June 2020 (figure 1). Pressure remains significant with global supply chain pressure peaking in December 2021. This reduces business output, erodes profitability and adds to inflation.

As with other structural changes though, the pandemic merely accelerated a pre-existing trend rather than creating it. Supply chains were becoming more localised and manufacturing activity was already nearshoring but the pace was much slower. The ability for supply chains to adapt is being fuelled by a variety of drivers (figure 2).

Ultimately the negative externalities of complex, lengthy supply chains and consolidated production have risen as uncertainty prevails and risk escalates. In parallel, the feasibility of nearshoring production and localism supply chains has increased. The cost/resilience balance is swinging in favour of the latter.

The trend towards JIC is only starting to gather momentum. Because supply chains remain heavily disrupted and are likely to remain so for some time, it is difficult for companies to satisfy existing demand, build inventory and relocate production concurrently.

It takes time to recalibrate supply chains which have developed over decades. It takes even longer to relocate production facilities and increase output sufficiently to replace offshored factories. However, it is far quicker to store greater inventory than relocate factories.

The McKinsey survey was undertaken twice in Q2 2020 and Q2 2021. Analysis of the results clearly shows that whilst many companies planned to nearshore activity in Q2 2020, few had done so a year later. By contrast, far more companies had increased their inventories by Q2 2021 than the number of those that had anticipated doing so in Q2 2020 (figure 3).

Despite businesses increasing inventory, stock remains extremely depleted. Evidence from Capital Economics, a data provider, indicates that companies deem Eurozone manufacturing stock levels to be ‘too small’ by the largest margin in at least two decades after a sharp falling during the pandemic (figure 4).

A Q4 2021 global survey of 125 senior level executives in the life sciences, machinery/automotive and consumer durable goods sectors by BCI Global, a supply chain consultancy, found that 85% rated “shortage of components/commodities/raw materials” as the biggest supply chain challenge today3. Delivery times remain lengthy which prevents companies from building sufficient inventory (figure 5). It will be some time before these times shorten given the extent of the backlog.

Meaningful scale-up of nearshored production capacity is unlikely to be achievable until the medium term. Significant planning is involved, given the dramatic reorientation of process and supply chains that this involves as well as the high capital investment. That is why there has been little evidence of nearshoring production to date despite business indicating that they plan to do so.

Nearly 90% of McKinsey respondents stated that that they expect to pursue some degree of regionalisation during the next three years. This is corroborated by the BCI Global Survey which established that 60% of respondents plan to nearshore activity away from Asia within the next three years.

The implication of this analysis on the extent of supply chain adaptation and manufacturing nearshoring is that this recalibration is at a very early stage. It is only just starting to gather speed and it is a trend with longevity.

Significant floorspace demand: occupier demand will escalate

Greater inventory and nearshored production require physical floorspace. Occupier demand for logistics, warehousing and industrial/light industrial stock will rise, compounding the existing supply/demand imbalance in favour of landlords.

In terms of specification, storage space requires little other than volume. This may mean that demand is focused on more affordable secondary logistics and warehousing space with height. The need for physical proximity to customers and producers implies that all European countries are likely to absorb rising demand and that transport connectivity will be a locational driver. Space near major transport nodes such as seaports, airports and multi-modal terminals may be most desirable.

Although modern production processes have lower labour requirements, labour is still needed. This suggests that Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries where labour is cheaper and more readily available along with lower operational costs may be most attractive. Western European markets are still easily accessible from the CEE. The BCI Global survey established that respondents considered CEE countries to be the most sought-after European countries for nearshored production. That said, the primacy of resilience over cost means that demand is directed towards western European countries too. Demand is expected to be focussed largely on industrial/light industrial space.

Production facilities typically rely on support from suppliers and logistics subcontractors. As such, the emergence of new nearshored production facilities will stimulate broader occupier demand in their surrounding localities. They are demand catalysts.

A rising tide lifts all boats: stronger rental growth is the most likely outcome

Analysis from a range of data sources and forward-looking business survey indicators suggest that Europe is on the cusp of experiencing a sustained build-up of inventory storage and a transition towards nearshored production. This will lead to substantial and prolonged demand for additional logistics, warehousing and industrial/light industrial space.

A rising tide lifts all boats. Even if demand is concentrated on storage and focused on secondary stock and production demand on light industrial/industrial, it will still limit choice and reduce optionality for occupiers across all types of logistics and light industrial space. This is likely to intensify competition for space, exacerbate the existing supply shortfall and stronger, more protracted rental growth.

Footnotes

1 McKinsey, 23 November 2021, How COVID-19 is reshaping supply chains
2 KPM, 1 September 2021, 2021 CEO Outlook
3 BCI Global, 16 February 2022, Global Reshoring & Footprint Strategy

DISCLAIMER
This material is prepared for discussion only and should not be relied upon for any other purposes. It has been prepared on a good faith basis but its contents have not been formally verified and no Cromwell entity or person accepts any duty of care to any person in relation to the information it contains. It should not be considered to be investment advice, marketing material or a promotion or offer of any Cromwell fund, product or services. Any person that wishes to invest in any Cromwell fund, product or services should refer to the relevant information or legal documents produced in relation to such opportunity before making any investment or other decisions. This document reflects the views of its author as at 9 May 2022.

A person typing on a laptop

Learn

Home Research Page 2
May 22, 2022

Supply chain adaptation will boost Australian occupier demand

A retreat from global supply chains is underway as businesses seek to maintain greater local inventory and production capacity. As global logistics networks are strained, businesses cannot yet fully enact their re-organisational plans despite a strong desire to do so. This implies momentum has yet to build and will only accelerate.

More local inventory and production means more physical space required. With logistics and industrial/light industrial floorspace supply already at record lows across Australia, intensifying occupier demand will create even stronger rental impetus.

 

From global to local: how supply chains are changing

One of the most immediate and lasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic has been supply chain disruption. Erratic swings in demand – toilet rolls and computer monitors one minute, bicycles the next – were exacerbated by logistics interruptions ranging from congested ports and the Suez Canal blockage, labour shortages across the transportation industry and bans on certain exports deemed to be of national importance.

The extent of the disruption reflects the international nature of supply chains which first emerged in the 1980s enabled by new technology and globalisation.

A ‘Just-In-Time’ (JIT) supply chain philosophy in which decisions on where to source, manufacture and store stock are made purely on a financial basis has become standard practice. Goods and components are shipped on demand just before they are needed to minimise storage costs and optimise working capital. Production facilities are located in emerging economies with lower labour and operational costs.

The downside of JIT networks is that they rely on stability and do not cope well with sudden, unexpected change. Rapid demand fluctuations, shipping backlogs or border issues erode their functionality and undermine the ability of businesses to fulfil orders. Reliably mitigating disruption means prioritising resilience over cost, with higher volumes of inventory being stored and production being undertaken locally where it can be better guaranteed. This is the ‘Just-In-Case’ (JIC) approach, the benefits of which have been viscerally demonstrated by the pandemic and, as a result, a mass pivot towards it is underway.

A global survey of senior supply-chain executives by McKinsey, a management consultancy, in Q2 2020 found that 93% planned to make physical changes to their supply chains to ingrain flexibility, agility and resilience in response to the pandemic1. Multiple initiatives were planned including diversification of raw material sourcing, increasing critical inventory and nearshoring production and suppliers.

A survey of global CEOs by KPMG, a professional services firm, in Q3 2021 established that ‘supply chain risk’ was jointly ranked as the top threat to business growth alongside cyber security and climate change risk2. It was ranked second in 2020 reflecting the growing awareness of, and concern with, supply chain risk. There was a marked 10 percentage point increase in CEOs rating this as the biggest threat. Supply chain adaptation is clearly at the forefront of corporate agendas.

Rising risk and uncertainty: why change is occurring

Multiple factors are combining to foster rapid supply chain adaptation. The pandemic brought urgency to the need for change, ensuring that all businesses understand how fragile supply chains are and the need to ingrain resilience. Global supply chain pressure rose immediately and remains near a record high (Figure 1). This reduces business output, erodes profitability and adds to inflation.

As with other structural changes though, the pandemic merely accelerated a pre-existing trend rather than creating it. Supply chains were becoming more localised and manufacturing activity was already nearshoring, but the pace was much slower. The ability for supply chains to adapt is being fuelled by a variety of drivers (Figure 2).

Nascent stage: adaption is only just starting

The trend towards JIC is only starting to gather momentum. Because supply chains remain heavily disrupted and are likely to remain so for some time, it is difficult for companies to satisfy existing demand, build inventory and relocate production concurrently.

It takes time to recalibrate supply chains which have developed over decades. It takes even longer to relocate production facilities and increase output sufficiently to replace offshored factories. However, it is far quicker to store greater inventory than relocate factories.

The McKinsey survey was undertaken in Q2 2020 and Q2 2021. Analysis of the results clearly shows that whilst many companies planned to reshore activity in Q2 2020, few had done so a year later. By contrast, far more companies had increased their inventory by Q2 2021 than the number of those that had anticipated doing so in Q2 2020 (Figure 3).

Despite businesses increasing inventory, stock levels remain depleted. ABS data on business inventories indicates these fell significantly after March 2020 as the pandemic hit (Figure 4). Whilst proportionally inventory levels have improved in 2021, this reflects base effects given the severity of the reduction experience in 2020. Australian inventory remains extremely depleted by historical standards.

Despite businesses increasing inventory, stock levels remain depleted. ABS data on business inventories indicates these fell significantly after March 2020 as the pandemic hit (Figure 4). Whilst proportionally inventory levels have improved in 2021, this reflects base effects given the severity of the reduction experience in 2020. Australian inventory remains extremely depleted by historical standards.

A Q4 2021 global survey of 125 senior level executives in the life sciences, machinery/automotive and consumer durable goods sectors by BCI Global, a supply chain consultancy, found that 85% rated “shortage of components/commodities/raw materials” as the biggest supply chain challenge today3.

Manufacturing suppliers’ delivery times are at a multi-year low which prevents companies from building sufficient inventory (Figure 5). It will be some time before these times shorten given the extent of the backlog which will prevent significant inventory increases in the immediate future.

Meaningful scale-up of reshored production capacity is unlikely to be achievable until the medium term. Significant planning is involved, given the dramatic reorientation of process and supply chains that this involves as well as the high capital investment. That is why there has been little evidence of nearshoring production to date despite business indicating that they plan to do so.

Nearly 90% of McKinsey respondents stated that that they expect to pursue some degree of regionalisation during the next three years. This is corroborated by the BCI Global Survey which established that 60% of respondents plan to reshore activity within the next three years.

The implication of this analysis on the extent of supply chain adaptation and manufacturing nearshoring is that this recalibration is at a very early stage. It is only just starting to gather speed and it is a trend with longevity.

Significant floorspace demand: occupier demand will escalate

Greater inventory and reshored production requires physical floorspace, and this greatly favours commercial real estate operators. Occupier demand for logistics, warehousing and industrial/light industrial stock will rise, compounding the existing supply/demand imbalance in favour of landlords.

In terms of specification, storage space requires little other than volume. This may mean that demand is focused on more affordable secondary logistics and warehousing space with height. Transport connectivity is likely to be a locational driver. Space near major transport nodes such as seaports, airports and multi-modal terminals may be most desirable.

Demand emanating from reshored production facilities is expected to be focused largely on industrial/light industrial space. Whilst modern production has lower labour requirements than in the past, access to skilled labour is still needed. This suggests demand will be focused near cities or other clusters offering ready access to specialist technical or manufacturing labour.

Production facilities typically rely on support from suppliers and logistics subcontractors. As such, the emergence of new reshored production facilities will stimulate broader occupier demand in their surrounding localities. They are demand catalysts.

A rising tide lifts all boats: stronger rental growth is the most likely outcome

Analysis from a range of data sources and forward-looking business survey indicators suggest that Australia is on the cusp of experiencing a sustained build-up of inventory storage and a transition towards reshored production. This will lead to substantial and prolonged demand for additional logistics, warehousing and industrial/light industrial space.

A rising tide lifts all boats, even if demand is concentrated on storage and focused on secondary stock and production demand on light industrial/industrial, it will still limit choice and reduce optionality for occupiers across all types of logistics and light industrial space. This is likely to intensify competition for space, exacerbate the existing supply shortfall and lead to stronger, more protracted rental growth.

Footnotes

1 McKinsey, 23 November 2021, How COVID-19 is reshaping supply chains
2 KPM, 1 September 2021, 2021 CEO Outlook
3 BCI Global, 16 February 2022, Global Reshoring & Footprint Strategy

DISCLAIMER
This material is prepared for discussion only and should not be relied upon for any other purposes. It has been prepared on a good faith basis but its contents have not been formally verified and no Cromwell entity or person accepts any duty of care to any person in relation to the information it contains. It should not be considered to be investment advice, marketing material or a promotion or offer of any Cromwell fund, product or services. Any person that wishes to invest in any Cromwell fund, product or services should refer to the relevant information or legal documents produced in relation to such opportunity before making any investment or other decisions. This document reflects the views of its author as at 9 May 2022.

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
April 7, 2022

Timber buildings – Truly sustainable real estate

In this special report, our Research and Investment Strategy team explore how timber buildings can be a critical part of the solution the real estate industry needs to mitigate climate change.

The report takes a deep dive into timber as a renewable building resource. Alex Dunn and Tom Duncan explore how using timber in new building construction can deliver positive environmental impacts and lead to truly sustainable real estate. They provide a balanced view of the benefits and challenges of timber construction; address some common misconceptions around its use and consider the advantages from an occupier and investor perspective. This is essential reading for all real estate stakeholders who are serious about enacting impactful environmental change.

The full report can be found by clicking here.

Timber-buildings-truly-sustainable-real-estate

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
March 8, 2022

ESG: a duty, not an option

The topic of environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters has been brought into sharp focus in recent times, thanks to the lessons of the pandemic, new EU regulations, and alarming emerging metrics on emissions and the impact of the built environment’s carbon footprint.

Sandrine Fauconnet, European ESG Manager recently participated in PropertyEU’s ESG roundtable where she and a panel of experts agreed that although the real estate industry has now grasped the importance of ESG, considerable action is still needed to make a difference.

The full roundtable discussion can be found by clicking here.

ESG-a-duty-not-an-option

A person typing on a laptop

Research and Insights

Home Research Page 2
March 8, 2022

Welcoming all talents

The global health crisis has been a stark reminder that companies need talented professionals to help them survive and thrive when unforeseen ‘black swan’ events disrupt business.

As the pandemic moves from a crisis phase into a management phase across Europe with the relaxation of restrictions, forward-thinking real estate firms are prioritising diversity and inclusion (D&I) to ‘crisis-proof’ their operations and boost performance.

Cromwell’s European Head of Capital Solutions, Danya Pollard , ESG Manager, Sandrine Fauconnet and Fund Manager, Eeva Saravuo recently spoke to PropertyEU about the importance of D&I in the real estate industry and the concrete steps Cromwell is undertaking to enable real change.

The interview can be found by clicking here.

Welcoming-all-talents